That's not the point, because it's all not about you, or what you believe, or all about the rest of the world.
So stop claiming that you gain protection. There's absolutely no guarantee that if you use Wasabi, you gain more protection as three-letter agencies are concerned.
There are no guarantees, yes, but it doesn't change the whole point that there are more risks that WasabiWallet is merely trying to avoid by accepting the trade off by having their coordinator block outputs used in "illegal transactions".
Let's assume they can, and will. What would happen to all of those outputs that went to a sanctioned mixer?
I guess these addresses are considered tainted from most spying companies out there. They can still be emptied normally, even though I don't cross my fingers the ingenious developer team won't fork the chain, and invalidate these balances. They've done it before, they can do it now; they're pro-censorship.
There's some probability that it might be connected to your real identity, right? I believe for ordinary users, just avoid taking actions that would put him/her at risk.
If you were nopara73, what decision would you make, that you believe, would be best for yourself, WasabiWallet, and its users?
How about not acting childishly and portraiting Wasabi's CoinJoin as the best privacy protection technique that's currently available, as a start? Furthermore, I wouldn't have reached to the position wherein I would have to choose between being a corrupted individual abandoning the project's principles or
shut down the whole thing.
The moment I began working on such software, I'd have made sure I gain maximum privacy. Ultimately, I wouldn't working on it, because there are better alternatives, namely JoinMarket.
Shutting down the whole thing would have been the best decision for me, but nopara37 accepted the trade off. Either users want to accept the trade off too, or use the more decentralized JoinMarket.