And you are just going to repeat the government line without any independent thought? I guess I shouldn't have expected anything less.

Please show me the "criminal financial flows" he personally concealed. Please show the money he personally laundered. Links to specific transactions please. You can't, because there are none. Tornado Cash is a smart contract. He might have helped write the smart contract, but he did not run it, he did not handle any transactions, he did not take custody of any funds, and he is not responsible for how other people used it. He wrote code. That's it. If they can arrest him because his code was used for illegal purposes, then they can arrest pretty much any developer for the same reason.

This is exactly what everyone except you was warning about last year, and which you ranted repeatedly that everyone except you was wrong.

Maybe you should write to the FATF and tell them that when they define P2P transactions as transactions which are "conducted without the use or involvement of a VASP", and that these transactions pose "specific risks" and "should be monitored", that they don't mean that at all and that you have figured out what they really mean after all.

I've literally never mentioned SARs once, but nice strawman.

So enlighten us then. In your fantasy world, what is your non-private privacy tool which definitely isn't related to privacy while letting you keep your privacy, that the average user will be able to easily use to improve their privacy while simultaneously completely fooling blockchain analysis and the FATF in to thinking it is not improving privacy?