This bastard @Hhampuz has already justified FortuneJack seizing 100k euros of my money, which is now a case a very respected lawyer is working on.
Please don't insult anyone and don't blame him for all your trouble.
I never had any problem with Hhampuz and I don't hold any grudge against him or anyone else.
I knew the risk using Fortunejack, and now I know not to trust them anymore.
I hope FJ legal team is happy.
It's good to know your following up your case with FJ @Paperwallet but lashing out and throwing insults won't solve anything would it? Why not concentrate on providing the needed details/evidence to prove your case. Your energy would be more worth th whole that way.
@notblox1, its a good thing you understood the risk and its a good thing your now getting the responses you did seek from the support team. All these are in line to prove that, the casino is concerned of there reputation and have every desire of solving yaw issues.
FJ forced me to verify for $200, in same time they blocked login access to their website, and refused to terminate my account.
If someone thinks that's ok, I don't know what else to say.
I guess you weren't forced to accept a T&C that carried in it terms of further verification if need be!
Mean while am just curious, if your denied access to your account as per login details, how then are you expected to complete KYC. Perhaps your saying its no longer an option on the table following delays to comply?
In either case, keep up with the team @FJ and do well to scale your options and go with what is bet suited for you as, yaw both have your stakes in this.
As per the behaviors of our identification system, it automatically sends out KYC requests to the FJ accounts that tend to have a chance of having an unusual activity. So was the case for the OP.
This explains that, the need for KYC isn't randomised but triggered by some unusual activities. How true is that and what might be yours @notblox1.