#LNMETA
During all the mempool nonsense just recently, I just watched a node manually drain out all my liquidity through their side, paid some handsome fees, and closed the channel on me.
Curious watching the overall game theory play out.
There is an idea I have entertained, but have been too busy to try much of it. Certain nodes will chew through liquidity like water... WOS for example. So I can open a king sized channel... set fees to whatever will more than cover the two tx fees. And then close with a profit, rinse lather, repeat.
But that feels dirty. Not because of fees, but because of settling on the main chain over and over. Defeats the purpose somewhat. I think the protpcpl is where the channel balancing problems may be best addressed... but I am not sure exactly how. There is no reason though that we should not be able to see channels be drained and filled over and over. Still thinking about it.