I meant that literally. Some people actually believe that power utilities will kick miners off this coming winter to have spare power for everyone else!
...
This seems like an equally ridiculous take to me. Are there any laws guiding what industries can be let off or what takes priority over others.
Mining is sort of a business venture for miners, same with industries and factories everywhere which consumes loads of electricity. Why would one take precedence over the other...
By lately some people have been claiming that "Bitcoin's power consumption is a central point of failure - someone can just switch off the electricity and all miners stop". And in particular "Bitcoin will not survive the coming winter". Both of these are wrong.
It was a tremendously bad argument in the first place. It's not like stopping all the miners is going to take a single(or a few) press of a button; it's going to require some sort of extensive global government collaboration to literally look for and stop every single miner(including miners that only run their operations at home). It's simply not realistically viable.
It would probably create an entire new wave of miners. Lower power, low noise, perfect for home mining. Perhaps get back to the rack mount style like the antminer S2 / Spondoolies tech miners so people could place it in their equipment racks and nobody would know the difference.
Yes, the governments could play whack-a-mole trying to find it all but it would never happen.
Since
BTC is for people to do with what they want, it can be a store of value, it can be a hedge against inflation, it can be an investment, it can be a cash replacement. It can be whatever you want it to be. And if someone does not agree, fine you don't have to agree it's what YOU want, not what THEY want.
-Dave