My comment was generic, it was not specific to FortuneJack or specific to your situation with them.
If customers are asked for KYC upon signing up it means they are probably going to find resistance but if they allow customers to sign up but implement KYC later it means even if the customers walk away without sending in their private details they will end keeping funds belonging to that customer.
A fair way for all businesses to operate would be allowing customers the option to withdraw funds and close the account if they do not want to send KYC and continue as a customers.
Nobody ever asked who is this third party partner asking for kyc, but I guess it's nothing...
If customers are asked for KYC upon signing up it means they are probably going to find resistance but if they allow customers to sign up but implement KYC later it means even if the customers walk away without sending in their private details they will end keeping funds belonging to that customer.
A fair way for all businesses to operate would be allowing customers the option to withdraw funds and close the account if they do not want to send KYC and continue as a customers.
If websites ask for KYC upon signing up it is up to the customer whether to join. If the websites asks for KYC after funds have been won/traded/deposited then the customer should be allowed to withdraw them and subsequently have their accounts closed if they do not want to send KYC.
It's all legal and done by the books, and fj is not controlling any funds after it goes to their legal team and third party partner.Nobody ever asked who is this third party partner asking for kyc, but I guess it's nothing...