But now a hunt to know more about the pseudonymous Satoshi has begun in earnest and after much collation of facts from his 539 BTC posts, 34 emails, 169 code commits, meta data from all version of Bitcoin he has worked on by researchers, still the search proved to yield no result until a recent research gotten from the Chain bulletin of an editorial which indicated that the first block chain activity was conducted in London.
Tbh, if Satoshi dont reveal himself none of the researcher can get him because this people never use their real information as a means of communication.
Therefore the first blockchain activities been conducted in London doesnt mean Satoshi is a Britain and for the record all the idea used by Satoshi is already available in cryptography community.
People should not deceive themselves to think they can conduct a research that could let them know about Satoshi Nakamoto. Satoshi can be a group of individual which is what I am thinking.
According to everything said about Satoshi through what Theymos said. Satoshi is definitely an individual although he have some professional C++ and tech savvy he has once worked with anonymously.
I respected him a great deal. He had an incredible amount of "arrogance" in the sense that he saw seemingly-impossible challenges and believed (correctly) that he could conquer them, but yet he had zero arrogance in the commonly-understood sense. He was willing to give help to and accept help from people who knew and accomplished far less than him on the whole. He treated even me with respect, even though I was a 19-year-old excessively-individualistic idiot in 2010.