First, I want to ask where this is going because of this statement.
It seems to me that BTC and Ethereum thank their growth prospects to their established names, rather than the tech behind it.
If you think it's different, let me know.
Instead of identifying what coin/project will not survive this market, why don't we identify what project is better than Bitcoin or Ethereum?
I won't even question it when it comes to Bitcoin.
So let's go to Ethereum. How about the number of ICO created with the use of smart contracts under ERC20?
Up until now, it is still the first choice even though the fees got higher.
Feel free to share your guess, but please back it up.
Does surviving or not depend on the amount of demand?
Or does it depend on the quality of the tech behind the project? Those 2 don't necessarily go hand in hand.
Demand, reputation, roots, security. Think of it like a brand name, Advil had been curing your pain relief for 10 years or more, it is always available and yet you try a generic not even sure about how it will affect you.
Risk factor.