Re: Anyone up for Beta Testing a Prototype on Lightning Network?
> I'm using C-Lightning v0.10.2 with RTL v0.12.3.
I found RLT buggy when I tried to use it, I wouldn't recommend it, its your coins.
> Look after your wording. You're the one who's generating the invoice, and thus the pre-image. Isn't that correct? Your server decides what my invoice will be. The pre-image you generate is strictly correlated with my seed. What prevents you from generating an invoice with non-random pre-image?
No its not correct. The lightning implementation generates an invoice. We run an LND instance on voltage, we communicate to it server-side.
The preimage doesn't exist when you generate an invoice
The preimage exists ONLY when you settle an invoice.
The preimage is generated by the lightning implementation you communicate to when YOU make a payment USING YOUR WALLET. ITS GENERATED BY YOU if anything.
If you don't believe me please go to the source code and point to the place where I'm wrong. I'm happy to refute it.
> It just froze. My internet was fine. The submission button was disabled for a couple of minutes, and the page remained the same.
Can you prove that to me?
You're the only person with all these issues.
First you ask for a full on breakdown of how the seed is verifiable
Then you go out and make a claim you can't provide verification for and implicitly ask me to just believe you - do you see where this is going?
I also have to be brutally honest here.
I communicated in a clear manner how it all works and why it's transparent.
I've had this conversation many times with other people including software developers and lightning contributors and they're all happy with it and understand why its verifiable.
I feel responsible for looking after my product and looking after my potential users. I explained everything to you, I can't entertain this anymore unless you provide some real information around your issues. Not just hurr durr the seed this the seed that
Any further messages from you that are a plain complaint, come off as slander and don't provide a backing solid argument will be ignored
I found RLT buggy when I tried to use it, I wouldn't recommend it, its your coins.
> Look after your wording. You're the one who's generating the invoice, and thus the pre-image. Isn't that correct? Your server decides what my invoice will be. The pre-image you generate is strictly correlated with my seed. What prevents you from generating an invoice with non-random pre-image?
No its not correct. The lightning implementation generates an invoice. We run an LND instance on voltage, we communicate to it server-side.
The preimage doesn't exist when you generate an invoice
The preimage exists ONLY when you settle an invoice.
The preimage is generated by the lightning implementation you communicate to when YOU make a payment USING YOUR WALLET. ITS GENERATED BY YOU if anything.
If you don't believe me please go to the source code and point to the place where I'm wrong. I'm happy to refute it.
> It just froze. My internet was fine. The submission button was disabled for a couple of minutes, and the page remained the same.
Can you prove that to me?
You're the only person with all these issues.
First you ask for a full on breakdown of how the seed is verifiable
Then you go out and make a claim you can't provide verification for and implicitly ask me to just believe you - do you see where this is going?
I also have to be brutally honest here.
I communicated in a clear manner how it all works and why it's transparent.
I've had this conversation many times with other people including software developers and lightning contributors and they're all happy with it and understand why its verifiable.
I feel responsible for looking after my product and looking after my potential users. I explained everything to you, I can't entertain this anymore unless you provide some real information around your issues. Not just hurr durr the seed this the seed that
Any further messages from you that are a plain complaint, come off as slander and don't provide a backing solid argument will be ignored