Absolutely, though if it concerns problems with Casino Critique itself I don't think I could be of much help. But I'm going to remain optimistic that there's not going to be any need for that. I'm also hoping the project turns out to reach some level of success--but I get the feeling that whether that happens or not depends on the team raising enough money to get started, and like I said, judging from the number of chips sold so far there hasn't been much interest.
If they really had a vision for the website and business they would make it happen even if they raised nothing more than the
0.005 BTC that already sits in their balance. I believe that address is theirs.
I do know that much of what's on the roadmap is vague, and CC's revenue goals are lofty to say the least. I think if they laid out a concrete plan with details as to how they're going to attract partners, sponsors, advertisers, and whatever else it might make it way more enticing to potential investors. I think I suggested something like that when I was doing my editing.
The real test for the team would be to openly announce who the other members are and then be ready face questions if they are asked. After that, they should be clear with their roadmap. They have not stated exactly who else beyond the 11 names mentioned are involved in the project and which capacity.
The thing is, people have become jaded by all the scam ICO projects that promised everything and delivered nothing that they're reluctant to buy into some profit-sharing program that doesn't have a detailed prospectus, trusted bitcointalk members or not.
That is the way it is. Scammers made off with phenomenal amounts of money via sham coin and token offerings.
If people are reluctant now it is because applying caution is far better than blindly jumping in. The days of launching an STO, IEO, ICO and other fundraising events to dupe gullible investors are over, the days of tokens and coins being sold to make teams wealthy while investors lost out such as in 2017 and 2018 are over. You are right, having detailed prospectuses will not help (but nor will having a part-anonymous team).