So you were not transparent enough to mention why they were unavailable but now you are saying they have backed out. Being unavailable and backing out are two different issues.
Please explain, where is the lack of transparency?
May be we both are having difficulties to understand each others. This could be language barrier, I don't know.
When we say they backed out we say the reason for it is they are NOT available, they have busy schedule ahead. So it's not clear what else you want to know? Besides you are free to ask by yourself the reason from the two cosigners. It's not difficult at all.
Get your story straight and start being both open and honest
Our story is straight forward and honest. To be transparent of the fund handling we have escrow in place (new setup will be available once ready), to be transparent in revenue collection we have multi-sig wallet between team members. What part is not straight forward? No single person is handling anything related to finance. What makes it to look bad?
It's hard to understand which part is irrelevant for you judging by your questions you are asking. All relevant information are on the website. Please get to know yourself.
I understand very well how multi-sig wallets work and feel free to not answer anything I ask about

Your understanding was in question because you were thinking the all three members will remain anonymous. How would it be then an escrow at all? I hope you understand the invalid point you had in your realization.
It's a waste of time for both of us unless you ask relevant valid questions that matters to answer. I hope we both agree in this.