so it make sense.
Although it will give different opinions related to "security"-like statements. The design really make sense related to the business insurance to funding security and etc.
Because if the casino website is hacked funds will be safe from hackers, now if the "crypto processing provider" they used is hacked, then its the third party's case but since it's a business it will be covered by their business insurance so on and so forth.
Based on different hacked incidents, those hot wallets that were hosted on the website's server and credentials save there, are the one who suffered the most.
I understand all the points and actually it doesn't matter if 2 casinos are owned by one company it's just that we want to confirm
You may know the case of sandboxcasino owned by the same company as OWL.games well this is what we want to avoid if a case occurs in one of them.
affiliated with any other casino.