This website is the least secure one I've ever seen.
After finding a serious vulnerability, I reported it to their team.
I obviously can't expect bug bounty rewards when the website doesn't have such a program, but this is the first website I've ever bug hunted on that didn't pay ANYTHING.
The vulnerability made me able to generate infinite USDT+BTC.
My advice is to avoid this site. You could easily lose your crypto due to a malicious actor (If the site bankroll is cleaned).
Well, if what you are talking about is really true, then what you have discovered can be considered a critical vulnerability, which of course is the most sensitive for the existence of casinos and if they treat security issues in this way, it is better to stay away, you never know what other bugs there are on the carpet.
Security is too important because we are risking our funds here. It will be best if they will do something about this matter right away. We all know that a casino site with security issues could easily have a ruined reputation. If they want to build a strong foundation of trust, they have to work on it.
I believe KYC should be mandatory for all sites of this nature. It would not be much effecting and attractive for new members without KYC. Also, I would OP buy a copper member account as well. Running a market campaign would also be mandatory for your site. I hope you can understand my point.
I think that it is necessary to proceed with great caution in this matter of KYC, I do not guarantee that someone does KYC in a recent casino, because in addition to the owner of the casino being anonymous and the casino itself is also anonymous and no one can guarantee that the owner of the casino will not take documents from people and sell on the black market, for that reason people need to be careful with new casinos, besides we are using cryptocurrencies, so KYC should be requested in cases where only suspicious activity was detected, but in this part New casinos have taken advantage of having in the TOS this part where it says they can ask for KYC in case there is any suspicious activity and since they don't even disclose the results of investigations, they created a way for the casino to withhold people's funds whenever they want
It's already been six pages of comments in this thread but the title still says "NO KYC" even though it's been pointed out already. I know you said it's only required on certain cases but let me repeat that it's still not a "NO KYC" platform. You probably placed it there for marketing since bitcointalk gamblers loves privacy and anonymity. Don't you have anything else to use than a misleading title?
I'm also wondering why he hasn't changed the thread title yet