Re: No more signature images

I don't like embedded images. They usually clutter up the discussion without much benefit. This is especially true of signature images: they take up more screen space than a few paragraphs, but they provide almost no value.

If you replace your signature image with a short direct link to an image, it would be easy for someone to write a GreaseMonkey script that expands these images.

But have you asked the COMMUNITY what it likes? Or do you just not care?

Really? People complained HARD about having a text ad under the first posting on each page. How are signature image ads not intrusive but a single text ad be something to complain about?

And there are plenty of other people who didn't complain about them.

I'd just like to see a vote on it, rather than theymos deciding that his personal preferences are what is best for everyone.