Regarding the 5 sold Chips, it depends on escrow again. If there's no escrow, there will be no fund from outside invested in the project.
I'm not sure my question was answered or if I just didn't understand. Whoever bought those 5 chips (in addition to the people who received giveaway chips) are still going to be sharing in a revenue pool or not? I just wanted to clarify that they are or aren't, regardless of how much money is raised.
It seems your question was not answered. He probably did not understand or misread it.
I've never used or been part of a 2-of-3 signature wallet, but I think I'd be correct in assuming that if one or more individuals no longer want to be responsible for signing transactions for that wallet, they'd have to relinquish control over their part, correct? Would I be mistaken to assume that those two escrow agents who've left the project have already handed over what amounts to full access over the Casino Critique wallet to someone else?
What does the OP have to say about this? As far as I interpreted
this team member stated here that the previous escrow still have access to the funds.
I'm just asking here, because I admit I don't understand fully how things are being carried out behind the scenes. And assuming the escrow issue gets taken care of, and it's only 0.005BTC we're talking about at the moment....the day may yet be saved as far as regaining transparency and/or trust. It'd be much, much worse if the team had thousands of dollars in their account--but I think if you're claiming to be "100% honest" (that was the original slogan), the more communication the better.
Well, let this be a lesson for this project and any others that are thinking of using this forum to launch their businesses. If they were being transparent from the beginning people would not be asking them for transparency later thus taking the conversation towards possible integrity issues rather than focusing on the core aspects of the project.