I try to make games.
I agree with copyright laws... To some extent.
Someone asked here: Why musicians are "entitled" to be musicians and not have a crap job?
Well, copyright was invented, to solve this, in fact, the first copyright law was a text that stated on it that it was a contract:
Artist and scientist would work full time as artist and scientist, thus making more work for society.
Society would pay that people back.
So, I want to make games... but right now, noone want to pay me for that, so I have another job, and it is so time consuming that I stopped making games. Who loses? Well, everyone. Me, that make no games, and players, that have none of my games to play.
Copyright was SUPPOSED to be a win-win thing, unfortunately, corporations (always them...) screwed things up, specially by making the copyright be author life + lots of time.
Tell me, will Disney (the guy, not the company) create more stuff with the current copyright law? Well... NO, HE IS DEAD.
Or, will Tolkien write more? NO, HE IS FUCKING DEAD.
DEAD PEOPLE DO NOT CREATE.
So, WHY THE HELL COPYRIGHT LASTS WELL AFTER THEY DIE?
That is to start.
So, I think copyright has a good essence, but a really evil implementation. (also the same goes for other IP laws, like patents... software patenting, seriously? Or trademark... with trademark trolls that trademark a common word and whatnot... Although the trademark law is the less broken of those laws, and work fairly well).
I agree all the way. The issue is that estates of dead creators have kept pushing for longer and longer copyright periods so they can keep profiting off of the deceased creator's work, but all that is is a form of leeching.