The 2 of 3 escrow still have the funds as you can see it was not moved. Once we will have a new setup then we will ask them to move it.
Sure, anyone can see the funds haven't moved, but that doesn't mean anything as far as the escrows are concerned. They might have relinquished control over their keys or signature piece or however it works without anyone knowing about it. Know what I mean?
This is imho rather unlikely and would hurt their reputation. So imho while some concerns may be OK, this looks exaggerated to me.
However, people can simply ask the escrows about that. It's not CC who has to say that (if he would be malicious he could easily lie anyway).
Seeing the controversy around, we may consider not having the public IBCO.
I would see this (or any) controversy as good. I would see it as advertising. It means there are people interested in the topic. It keeps the topic visible, after all, isn't it?