Team is always evaluating the result from the signature campaign. In my opinion if a signature campaign that has been running by a popular site will be going ever longer due to the numerous factors
The revenue from the platform will become main consideration to continue the campaign or not. Remember that only those big sites which have been getting millions dollars of revenue from the gamblers unlike the new sites which have been starting from the bottom.
This is also affecting the duration from the signature campaing that being launched before.
I think that any gambling platform providers have various reasons why the campaign was only going in a short time.
This could be right, they are just probably seeing how the result would be upon applying what casinos does in marketing the casino in the biggest crypto forum.
They could be back in the campaign soon once they tried other marketing strategy. If they find out the signature campaign in the forum works better than the others campaigns they are doing, they might just put more allocation for sig campaign.
Casino doing a signature campaign in bitcointalk earns trust from the community which could be what they are evaluating for now.
Agreed, i don't know why OP must always use bearish trend as a reason for signature campaign to be ran in a short time. The team behind gambling platforms are actively monitoring the result from the campaign. We know that there are so many people who actively playing gambling in this forum and it's also crypto related forum which makes the sites seems pretty easy to attract them to visit their sites and try their platforms.
The problem is if it's not always a new site that promoting in this forum must always get a good result from their marketing efforts