~
I don't know about stifling innovation, that also sounds like another excuse. If I did something new and 1000 people copied me, I would be finding day and night to make my stuff even better. How does it stifle innovation?
Yep, it doesn't. That's what companies that created something new and original are doing all the time: they are trying to improve their creation and trying to invent something new once again, since they are, obviously, capable of that.
You can spend your lifetime on copywriting, licensing and suing those who "have stolen your work", or you can just ignore them and spend your time on creating something new and useful. I mean, you can do both, but in my opinion those judicial proceedings will suck you dry.
Absolutely true my friend, and to be honest, without copycats, perhaps more companies would be happy to sit down and enjoy their success since why work for something new and different when there is no competition and everyone doesn't copy your stuff?
To be fair the only ones who go for suing in court are those with so much money to make from winning or just egoistical people.
Though now you mention it
I wonder if any crypto casinos have ever gone to court to sue a copycat?
I know at least one case. You can read about it following the link below:
Wynn Resorts Sues Resorts World for Being a Copycatbut it was about the looks of a
land based casino. As for the online casinos, there was at least one case too:
MGM Sues Online Casino Over Trademark Infringement and “Identity Theft”And you can read in the same article the following:
In 2015, Sheldon Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands Corp won a similar lawsuit against 35 Chinese online gambling websites that each appropriated the company’s logo and played fast and loose with its intellectual property.
So, all those newly appearing gambling sites shoula keep in mind that intellectual property must be respected.