Feel free to share your guess, but please back it up.
Does surviving or not depend on the amount of demand?
Or does it depend on the quality of the tech behind the project? Those 2 don't necessarily go hand in hand.
It seems to me that BTC and Ethereum thank their growth prospects to their established names, rather than the tech behind it.
If you think it's different, let me know.
This time will not survive useless projects. Which do not carry any useful component for the crypto community. Those who offer a really useful solution will only increase and there will be a leap in development. Old projects that already have their own product and vision will also raise their level and become even more stable.
Utility is the thing that makes a coin good or bad, and if you do not have utility then you are not going to end up with a good project. Most projects do not have that kind of utility and that is something that causes a lot of trouble for people, I mean it is going to be something rare for a project with absolutely no usecase at all to end up with a success, it could happen if they end up spending a lot of money on marketing but that is just tricking people to invest at first, but it will go down eventually when there is no reason to buy.
But if there is a usecase, then you give people a reason to buy and that will make it a lot more entertaining and profitable.