Therefore what is the best way to find a solution to settle this issue? A manner in which it can be resolved allowing the OP to have their rightly owned funds returned and for you the OP to never have anything to do with each other again?
It obvious as you stated.
BTW, funds are already with an arbiter and we do publish bank statements at the following link where you'll also fice copy of the defamation procedure against the OP:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AcIIsoWP5mcMCApKMMPtTokkXfS9eyIz?usp=sharingThe OP is arguing that we do have control of the arbiter and we proposed him to select a new one but, the new arbiter would require the OP a kyc as well...... So he refused the proposal...
Again it is obvious he was capable to get access to an account which is not owned by him. Therefore, ten years from now, we will be at the same point.......