I am sure that a lot of teams are going to want to get Green on the team. But the Lakers are not one of them. I think Brooklyn NETS might be a good destination for Green. The Nets might let Joe Harris and another player go to get Green. But I am just assuming.
The Brooklyn Nets will mess up what they worked hard for at putting Simmons, Kyrie, and KD in good form if they bring him in. I don't think they will add another piece to that roster that could break their chemistry or whatever leadership they already agreed with.
I don't think the Nets have any real interest in Green. Besides him being a 1-year rental for them at this point, he doesn't mesh well with the team they've built. His game is a perfect match for Steph and Klay because they can both change the game coming off screens for quick shots. The Nets have guys that all create their own shot, so I don't expect that many of their attempts will be made off screens. They're also not a run and gun type of team where Draymond's smaller size for his position plays an advantage. I think a better pairing would be the Lakers waiting until the offseason to see if they can get Green and Buddy Hield for cheap.
I agree with this statement as well. The Nets are not looking to create any problems between the players and the chemistry that they already have built just to bring Green in. However, I also do not think that Green is a necessity for the Lakers either. If they can get Green for a cheap price, sure, go for it.
However, I am highly doubtful about Green's ability to actually settle in with the Lakers and be a part of the team's success. Unless he is able to provide something while the team is on the offense. Which I am sure he cannot unless he has the ball in his hand.
So, in conclusion, Green's return to the Nets seems to have fallen through. As it turns out, Laker's move has some positive aspects. But I think that the move might happen if the Lakers get him for a cheap price.
Regards
Duke