Irony, double meaning and sarcasm doesn't seem to be your things, as far as I can see. But partly that helps me to confirm the idea I had: that you don't consider the last 5 posts I wrote before this one, the 5 written yesterday as burst posting, probably because you don't consider them of low quality.
It's simply that I recently had a disagreement with someone I respect about what is burst posting and that person considers that I sometimes border on what would be burst posting because I write at wider intervals than that.
Normally, when I'm fresh and rested, and I've just had a coffee, I usually write 3 or 4 posts in an average interval of 10 minutes, rather than 5 like I did yesterday. If the community does not consider my yesterday's posts as burst posting, it helps me to reaffirm myself in my idea.
There are many factors to consider burst posting
- Quality is main factor. If your posts are short and very low quality but they are written in short period. Only these are enough to judge as burst posting
- Quality is good. Assume so, there are other things behind it. Because posters have many ways to post. You can scan forum topics, and pick ones that you are interested in, want to join discussion. Next, two options to make your posts
- Compose each post and publish it instanly. Most of us posting in this way with which time interval between posts should be long enough. Especially if you find topics, make one post, then find other topics and make other posts.
- Compose each post, reserve it in draft and publish all posts in a batch. That would case a more likely burst posting.
Years ago, actmyname tested how many posts he can make in 60 minutes.