⭐ Merited by Poker Player (3)
Irony, double meaning and sarcasm doesn't seem to be your things, as far as I can see. But partly that helps me to confirm the idea I had: that you don't consider the last 5 posts I wrote before this one, the 5 written yesterday as burst posting, probably because you don't consider them of low quality.
My assumption is indeed that the classification as "burst posting" should be related to low quality posts. It doesn't make sense to complain when someone makes many good posts in a row. Once in a while I forget to post a post, and find that tab back right after posting another post. That means I have posts just seconds apart, and there's nothing wrong with that.However, from a campaign manager's (advertising) perspective, I get that they want their exposure to be spread evenly throughout the week. That's fine too, if they make a rule that posts have to be at least 30 minutes apart, they're free not to count/pay for those posts. But they shouldn't expect me to change what I'm doing.
Quote
It's simply that I recently had a disagreement with someone I respect about what is burst posting and that person considers that I sometimes border on what would be burst posting because I write at wider intervals than that.
Would your post be any better if you keep the tabs open, set a timer, and post the same posts 30 minutes apart?Quote
If the community does not consider my yesterday's posts as burst posting, it helps me to reaffirm myself in my idea.
Why does it matter what the community thinks in this case? If it's not spam, it's okay for the forum. If a campaign manager disagrees, that's fine too. No amount of community pressure is going to change the ROI of an advertising campaign.TL;DR Burst posting is fine, shitposting is not.
Quote
Irony, double meaning and sarcasm doesn't seem to be your things
So you're saying my sarcastic reply wasn't sarcastic enough? 
I mean, look at this guy, burst posting 3 posts in just 13 minutes! Obviously, he's just shilling for the coin he made up
Hey, burstposting is not allowed in the campaign but your quality is decent so i'll not make a big deal of it. Please be a little more cognizant of the timing of your posts in the future.
As you can see, I appreciate his quality and was not rude with the user. I also am trying out a couple new rules in the campaign and I think it's only fair to treat everyone the same unless we have spoken and come to a mutual agreement.
Quote
Burstposting will not be tolerated
Quote
I was not expecting the pm I got next. Basically he said he would continue as is and if it's an issue I'll just have to kick him.
In my opinion, that makes perfect sense. I would probably have told you the same Quote
I don't feel like he was trying to be a dick
For the record, I wasn't trying to be a dick either 
It just doesn't feel right to adjust your posting for a signature campaign.Quote
Now let's talk about why burstposting is a big deal. Let's say I open a sig campaign with 1 member in it. A burstposter is whom I selected and they make all their posts in 1 day. What happens to that users posts? Basically, after about 2 hours their 20-25 posts they made for the campaign will be buried on page 2,3,4 or whatever page. The advertisement in their signature space will be non existent and the company that paid me to hire that user will have wasted their money.
Shouldn't this be something you check before accepting a participant? Ideally, the user would be able to keep doing what they were doing already, and that gives the right exposure.