There are softwares already which can generate AI arts so I think this one should not count because if they allow AI arts for sure many participants will enter and just go with the software so that it can generate them an art without putting to much effort on it. That is so unfair to the participants who spend to much time to their arts creating manual arts or even hand written ones.
They can participate, but the probability for them to win is very low because with Roobet art contest, there's a lot of good participants and most of them are digitally hand drawn and carving something into the best art. The team of Roobet knows this for sure, so we don't have to worry about that software or if they won using other's picture or art, then we can raise that concern into the right thread. Few days left before the end of the new contest, better to focus on that.
There’s no question about how they choose the winners but if there’s a software like this that can easily create a good art by putting all the images that they get from google is quiet not fair, but it’s not our call since it can be creative as well. If you think this is not ok, better to raise this concern now on the right art thread to avoid any participants with that kind of art.
Roobet isnt that dumb not to know those software-make images which it doesnt really need up to put much effort for them to do so and able to submit.They would of course be looking on arts which had been
well made and put up extreme effort and time for it to be done.Its one of their criteria of course and with having this digital age then it not impossible on creating images on sheer efforts.
They can submit all the want, as long it wasnt been prohibited then its up to theirs if they would be using it but i do believe they would be sticking into those handrawn.