Actually it's pointless to compare the early year of Bitcoin with the current year because Bitcoin price is really cheap on 2010, while Bitcoin price right now is already worth for $19K-ish which is the gap is too far.
It
is pointless to cherry pick, but isn't that the whole point of we're trying to argue wanting to say gold performs better than Bitcoin? We can switch the goalposts all we like to fit our agenda, that's usually the point.
Start of Bitcoin and start of gold, put them side by side and see where we are today. That'd probably be the fairest but then I would whine that that puts 10 years of Bitcoin in comparison to thousands of gold.