And many more users, I do not have a list in hand and I can not remember all of them.
Then I'm totally confused now
why this was such a big deal with 5 pages of cover up.
I appreciate you read the last long post, I don't expect you to read everything from this too. Here is the straight answer of your simple question.
"...with the ruined situation of my personal account especially not wanting to deal with the two specific members anymore, I decided to keep it disconnected from my personal account so that I could focus on the project only. "
I understand this as the initial motivation. I don't understand the cover up when you got outed. That was the time to say "yep, it's me, not really a secret because many more users know this" and move on. You knew at that point that this secret has no chance so what was the plan?
And yes, I misunderstood the posts of some other users earlier in the thread... I thought they were saying "we know who CC is and it's not Royse777" but they were just playing along with your charade. So you didn't deceive them as I initially thought. You just deceived everyone else.
For someone that was caught in some shaddy deal with the devil and hot yo see the light only after the devil had robbed her of her time, money and reputation, I think the person still deserves a second chance to life on the things he loves. I think Royse777 has done her bit of explaining and having her confidentiality in a few with hopes of rebuilding a lost reputation could be given a benefit of the doubt, looking at the other many reputable members involved.
Most of what the cryptocurrency is about revolves around trust and privacy, with confidentiality not making much sense to us, where then do we stand in issues of privacy.
One who suspects something shaddy has got to speak up anyways but I can't help but have a soft core for Royse777.
Well, see above. According to Royse777, everything and everyone is wrong except Royse777. Benefit of the doubt usually comes with remorse and humility, which is severely lacking here.
Anyway, let's backtrack a little bit. If I was considering investing in whatever this CC project is I would surely want to know who is involved in it. Wouldn't you? So we could find a lot of reputable members linked to it but one important member was hiding. That's kinda sketchy in its own right. Then it turns out it's Royse777, recently involved in a scammy casino. I would consider this whole scheme very dishonest and deceptive.
And that's me - someone who didn't really consider Royse777 guilty in the BitLucy debacle. Now imagine if someone thinks Royse777 is a scammer and they get deceived by the presence of all these reputable members in the CC project and put their money into it, only to find out that a scammer (in their view) is involved and said reputable members hid that information.
I don't think that's right. I don't think that's how you rebuild reputation. I think being honest is how you rebuild reputation.
I might be wrong though. Maybe sockpuppeting and lying about it and blaming others is the Bitcointalk way.