No one had said that his actions outside this forum are not true as no one cared whatever he does outside the forum as well as outside his case against Stake. In regard to proofs, OP have not mentioned any proof as well other than his denial with the accusation on his match making issue with Stake.
It's all over the thread, talking about his account's negative trust (faking KYC) in relation to his threads of Stake's claims without strong evidence for the "match fixing".
It's not about defending the service or platform; it leans more on people who are likely to believe with Stake rather than someone that has not provided any solid proof that the accusation against him is false or not true. Also, just as Stake or Stunna previously said, the main issue is not about KYC issue (which is true and could be used as supporting evidence that OP is suspicious and likely to do shady things) but rather the match-fixing issue that has been addressed by Stunna and still in an on-going investigation within Stake.
If the account suspension is related to faking KYC then i would believe Stake did the right thing, that's obviously illegal.
But suspending an account without any strong evidence? That's already how many months ago yet there's no final conclusion of this
investigstion.
I will tell its unreasonable and how should i believe that. That's why i said people keep blindly believing of a reputed site saying whatever it is because they are reputed.