Any accusation without proof is just bullshit as we can mark from the writing of words that are concocted to bring down the reputation of Stake casino.
I am not trying to be the devil's advocate here but what about looking at this from the other side?
What about the allegations made by casinos when the ban a player's account and confiscate his money. Accusing him of match fixing or having multiple accounts.. without providing any evidences and their pretext is always that they don't won't to publish personal information or disclose how their anti-cheat systems work! Do you think it's acceptable?
Just to be clear, am asking in general and not about this particular case. I don't think this is a matter of being accepted or not, but more about maintaining the privacy of people whose accounts have been banned by the casino, could be the casino will have new problems if they open it to the public because it means revealing players' personal data.
The player has been given the opportunity by the casino to prove that he is cheating or not by doing KYC but he actually includes false data so that it makes the casino believe that the player is dishonest and as far as I know so far only KYC is the method used to prove all accusations against players.