Any accusation without proof is just bullshit as we can mark from the writing of words that are concocted to bring down the reputation of Stake casino.
I am not trying to be the devil's advocate here but what about looking at this from the other side?
What about the allegations made by casinos when the ban a player's account and confiscate his money. Accusing him of match fixing or having multiple accounts.. without providing any evidences and their pretext is always that they don't won't to publish personal information or disclose how their anti-cheat systems work! Do you think it's acceptable?
Just to be clear, am asking in general and not about this particular case. Well, it is true we have not seen any evidence from Stake about how they determined the OP was fixing matches and betting on them, and I would like to see casinos offer more evidence when they make accusations like that as well.
However the little evidence that we have seen about this case about the multiple attempts by the OP to try to identify himself with many different documents leads me to believe Stake is on the right here.