I find it sad that Craig Wright is the subject of so much malice. He was the first to publicly explain how bitcoin is Turing. He was immediately mocked by his colleagues and yet he is right. What are his colleagues doing to further develop bitcoin "for some define themselves as bitcoin researchers"? The answer is: nothing.
There are dark forces at work to discredit him in unison, using extremely elaborate social engineering tactics. As evidence of this, I came across this profile https://twitter.com/Twetchdater/with_replies which had fun cataloguing the gratuitous nastiness and stupidity created by a stream on the bitcoinsv blockchain. Look at the typography of the censuses, the words used, the waves, some profiles have exactly the same establishment, hidden behind images, very few real profiles in the end and yet. This creates a current of social engineering.
That said I understand that many people (real people) appear frustrated because Craig Wright has signed blocks in front of people in the past. And these people don't understand why he doesn't do it again. Apart from the legal exposures this creates but at the same time it seems obvious that at the moment if Craig Wright were to do it again this same process could be invalidated by the corrupted code that has become the modified source code of BTC over the years. The missing alert key feature removed from the BTC code is a perfect example. How many trojans have been implemented since Core and Blockstream have been in charge of the scam that BTC has become?