I am not sure what you experienced but I am sure this information is not correct.
Evidence lacking for "this information is not correct." statement
To be fair, what I think tranthidung was disputing was specifically your assertion here, which you didn't provide evidence for either:
The laughable state of this forum, I've been reading this website since at least 2014, most active during 2015-2016 and the website is just unreadable at this point. 99% of the posts are from bounty hunter spammers
And if we're talking about the "99%" statement, I would only say that if that were true the forum would be nearly identical to Yobit's cryptotalk.org back when they were paying people to post on it. True, I don't have any hard data either, but I read that forum now and again and I would have estimated (generously) that 1 in 100 posts wasn't of zero-value; the rest were exactly what you'd expect from the worst of bitcointalk's bounty hunting shitposters.
Yeah, could be. I'm not sure which he's most upset about though, the yet-to-be-Legendary problem or the forum quality one. And if he's really only here to spam (which somehow I doubt, given how long he's been a member and despite the inactive periods), the quality issue wouldn't even be a blip on his radar.