So yeah, you're a believer in "the energy needed to create it is what gives it value" dumbass argument. That's no different to saying a TV goes up in value as it gets older because it's used more electricity.
I don't know if you've realised this but you're not on winning territory here. If mining really was a "cost of production" like your ridiculous TV analogy we'd be at the top of the POW marketcap rankings and not bitcoin.
I just explained why it isn't and my explanation is supported by what we see in the market so I suggest you rethink and go and read what I wrote above again. Then come back and try to argue that producing a blockchain token more "cheaply" with "less electricity" makes it more valuable.
See how many investors you get for that idea.
Dash is the live experiment that's already giving us the answer and if you want to sit on your hands while that experiment reaches its logical conclusion then prepare for page 2 status and probably rapidly page 3 once the reality sets in for investors.