Unfortunately, AP says:
"CryptoDirect @CryptoDirect Apr 4
@boxxa @guruvan You don't do surgery on a new-born baby. MazaCoin is not a democracy we don't vote on changes."
That does make me wonder about something. Why even have a lead developer (or whatever Boxxa's position was called), if AP basically just does whatever it is he wants to do? And why in the World did Payu agree to sign up with a developer if that developer has full and complete control of the coin?
A project like this should either be a democracy, or whoever is out there publicly (Payu) should have full control... be the boss, and simply pay a dev to work for him. It does seem like they have a bizarre setup.