At the risk of making this a serious thread instead of the clown circus that BA likes, I wonder how would an strategy to take Zapo nuclear plant would look like. It would require an encirclement of quite a length and laser precision in all an any action to avoid and invitation to a rad-party with a +20. It also would need to include a quite difficult river crossing.
I wonder if some independent-thinking psycho could even decide to win the war by himself - one does not get to own a red button every day you know.
Russian TG channels (used to bubble up to the MOD reports as well) often repeat fairy tales about dozens of Ukrainian boats attempting to cross the massive Dnipro reservoir the nuclear plant is next to. Of course the glorious Russian forces repeatedly destroy all those boats but the Ukrainians keep trying. There was also the infamous video of Russians firing at a bridge pylon and claiming it was... yep, a boat. So they seem to have a serious obsession about it.
You know you have superiority complex, maybe even fascist inclination, when you only
value western media, one that brought us Ghost of Kiev and other such garbage
The only place I've heard of the Ghost of Kiev was this thread, and I think it was you who posted about it. So I think your understanding of "Western media" and how people use it is severely skewed.
Don't blow up the dam? But Russia is adding reinforcements to Kherson down the dam and without the dam Crimea would loose its fresh water access. And you know how Russia likes to blow up their gas pipes and shell their nuclear plants, not sure if they can just hold back from blowing up the dam that helps them so much?
Compelling arguments but I still think that blowing up the dam is a bad idea.
Losing when it might be losing, you could've just said that it's inconceivable to you.
Losing in unlikely with the way things stand now. "(In)conceivable" tends to be a
weasel word in this context but I can understand why you would use it.