When a player stated a case and asked to gain sympathy or support from the community, it is a must to provide detailed evidence and proof that he is innocent. It is easy to play the victim and accused the casino of stealing his fund when in reality he is actually the one exploiting the casino. We had seen this kind of case many times here. In this case, it isn't the gambling platform that needed sympathy or support but the player who feels he is wronged. So definitely the player must provide valid proof that he is actually wronged by the casino.
There are too many cases like that, they play as the victim but when assessed by the casino from their accounts. They have found to be the ones violating the rules of that casino they're complaining about.
Also, it's easy to say that they've been robbed or scammed where in fact that they've lost. And if there's a huge partnership that allowed them to advertise, they're criticizing it as if the casino don't have the fund to put on such ads deals.