I like how you conveniently leave out that "their own" hydro and nuclear plants, are actually fully controlled and claimed by Russia to now be totally Russian and don't provide any electricity to Ukraine anymore. But your target audience don't really need to know these inconvenient facts at all right? Why even attempt to be objective when you can just keep on pushing your agenda.
These are Ukrainian power plants, so yes, "their own". However it still stinks of projection if you call them "russian". Russians
are bombing Ukrainian electric supply infrastructure and
are accusing of Ukrainians thinking about doing the same.
See it's only a loaded question for people spreading propaganda, as by definition they can't even discuss negative outcomes or the precursors to them, where objective people can discuss anything. I for one can and did easily state that if Ukraine in total is still taking land in January, Russia might be loosing, or if Ukraine gets tanks and trillions in new commitment to counter RU mobilization (instead of just warm scarfs, gloves and more ammo) it's another indicator of escalation to which RU's only options are either a tactical nuclear response or a total collapse. See how easy it is when you're not just spreading propaganda?
Brush up on English grammar, comrade. Your question was asked and answered in present tense. If you want to engage in conjecture, I'm more that happy to let you talk about May 9 parades and other stuff that we can laugh about a few months later.
Talking about tactical nukes and accusing me of propaganda LOL