Again false accusations, this time plagiarism.

This is a free interpretation of the definition in my presentation. Supported by a relevant fresh example.
Not an accusation, quite contrary. It doesn't match any known definition of "anglo-saxon" so I'm curious where you got it from. It is somewhat similar to how some white supremacists use it (white English-speaking population). But if you made it up - that's fine. Just don't expect anything more than a laugh at this nonsense.
In your opinion, about fifty US biological laboratories in Ukraine are nonsense?
How is that relevant to the absurd definition of "anglo-saxon"?
If this is a lie, then why not investigate, study the evidence that Russia is ready to provide, and bring Russia to clean water? Why did the US, UK and France vote against this at the recent UN Security Council?
Because no one wants to waste time on something that is obviously made up. Any sane judge would throw out a case like that in court, they wouldn't say "let's investigate and study the evidence that Bob is ready to provide about Alice being a wolverine".