There are so many people in the Bitcoin Talk Forum who have interest to discover the true identity of the Bitcoin and Blockchain inventor. Also there are few who oppose the matter, that Satoshi Nakamoto must not reveal his identity.
I am so much confused regarding matter. So I think, it would be better to arrange a concensus about the identity of the Bitcoin and Blockchain inventor. The members of this forum can vote for themselves and it will be helpful for Satoshi Nakamoto to make a correct discussion.
What is your opinion ?
Even there will be a consensus that has been built, there's no way to identify who satoshi nakamoto really is. Just put that into grave that we'll never know who exactly he is.
He has introduced bitcoin as anonymous and now, he's maintained his position to be anonymous so that it'll be the same as him. Let's just leave this as one of the most interesting mystery that we'll never know.
You cant really avoid for people not to look up on the origin of something like Bitcoin which we know that this creation did really make out that huge breakthrough considering this do really involves
anonymity and decentralization where i couldn't really blame those people who had this kind of thriving out to seek on whats the truth.We know that Satothis identity mystery had been always a question
even up to these years or a decades time on whose behind but since he had decided for himself not to show himself into the public then lets just respect on his decision.
We know that showing himself into the community or public will really boost up even more on Bitcoin but now we are seeing the opposite side of things.
It's just best to remain as is and what it is. He has proven his or their worth to be kept anonymous and hidden for several years and it's just best to be like that forever.
Even how hard we want to know who satoshi really is, if there were consensus before that would like to know the real him, they've done it before but, it just increased the number of impostors portraying as him without valid evidence.