Just because the manager counts a post and the moderator doesn't delete it doesn't mean the post is actually good. Most of the time, our reports go unhandled because there are so many of them. Additionally, some managers use Ninjasty.space to count posts without properly evaluating the posts' quality as long as the user met the weekly post requirement.
Of course, in altcoin announcements I've often seen threads very long and filled with spam. In some cases they were even paying for that spam to keep their topic look alive. But I still feel like restricting topics' length will do nothing good.
For now I still think that the only solution is to report the spam.
The gambling "report to moderator" function is less effective than it is on the Meta and, of course, on the economy child boards. There are a lot of unhandled reports on gambling discussions, so I personally prefer to have a list of all the spammers so that managers can evaluate their posts before accepting or counting them.
I'm not sure i missed that
Sorry, but then I don't think that the poll holds any value. It will only tell whether there are people somewhat sharing your view, but no information at all about the rest.
i didn't think it was necessary since it was a kind of probability question that needed a probability answers too. but well, I've added the No option.