Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Forecaster rating
by
aliborn
on 15/11/2022, 19:59:30 UTC
Yes, there are many selection criteria.  Information is not easy to organize.  Here is the current list, part with open access, part of the channels at the very end with paid access and therefore only their names are given.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bmabPRIVhXz75PllxwPUhK8moGW1pTTuXGkFADcffic/edit#gid=0

The work is not finished

there is a lot to do here, although I don't understand the whole concept of what you want to do with this collection. and in my estimation, you have 6-12 months of testing each one individually. too much time, I don't know if you will manage to monetize and you will probably abandon it at some point.
if at some point this list of yours achieves a good reputation and gains trust, Do you want to accept for a fee to add some channels that you haven't tested or maybe they don't give good results?

you need to put some effort into the design of this table. First, you can't combine Russian and English languages in the same table, someone doesn't understand both or it can be hard to read. Also, the Telegram links to the channel, the logo, and the name of the channel can be much smaller or discreet, because there is no need to emphasize such things.
I must do a horizontal scroll to put away useless information and get to the one that is useful to me.

Initially, I wanted to make objective statistics, thereby drawing attention to the list.
 I have my own tool that allows you to open a deal on the signal that appears in the channels automatically on the Binance exchange.  I thought to create a small community around the list that use such channels and give their assessment and possibly discuss working methods.