The last mixer I saw that claimed to use coinjoin, didn't use coinjoin. In this case, I see many red flags: despite being a brand new website, they claim to be able to coinjoin 100 Bitcoin. Doing that would require several other users to coinjoin the same amount at the same time, which isn't realistic.
@OP: can you sign a message proving ownership of anything close to 100 Bitcoin? My gut feeling tells me the most likely scenario after someone deposits 100 Bitcoin is an an exit scam. And it will happen at much lower amounts too.
You should know that bitcoin transactions on the blockchain are far from secure
Did you come up with this BS on your own?
"The blockchain is insecure"
-- Newbie who asks to be trusted with 100 Bitcoin
Hi there!
I think you didn't read our last answer, our CoinJoin is real but not CoinJoin by definition, this concept is adapted to our own methods.
Moreover the principle of CoinJoin does not require at all a sending at the same time and at the same amount per user, otherwise no service could ensure it given the impossible amounts to predict. It is only when we receive different transactions from users that CoinJoin and our methods take effect for sending. Hence the variable delay.
Maybe not developed enough on our first post.
You are totally free not to trust us but we are absolutely not a "scam" just a new service and obviously it is difficult to find its audience.
However, we don't ask for big amounts now, we even advise trials with small amounts, and then the first criticisms will be useful to improve the service.
When we talk about a non-secure blockchain, we are talking about users' transactions that are traceable and absolutely not about security flaws. If it was the case we would not launch a service on this same blockchain!
Thank you for your comment and I hope I made it clearer.