Advertising or even using the service doesn't mean you're using it illegally.
I know, but can you trust regulators nowadays? Remember what happened with that Ethereum mixer this year? Just a friendly reminder that even self-custody is a red-flag for intergovernmental organizations:
https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/Updated-Guidance-VA-VASP.pdfThis site though expects the community to take the responsible approach and not encourage or support users who would engage in the advertising of money laundering activities for their own benefit.
You're going to have a hard time convincing this board, me included, that enhancing Bitcoin privacy effectively, cheaply and in a comfort manner is trifle in comparison with it being used as money laundering in some cases, and in a negligible manner.
What does an illegal centralized service have to do with enhancing Bitcoins privacy effectively? Its a disaster waiting to happen for so many different reasons
Lets forget the fact that it exists to protect thieves and money laundering activities and just focus on the fact the some guy out there could just rob all the customers or misuse funds like Sam did with FTX. You think this is an enhancement for Bitcoin? Its a centralized regulatory attack vector that makes everyone look bad and is definitely not how privacy should be enhanced for Bitcoin. Not sure why anyone would think otherwise. Maybe if they considered the FTX platform as an enhancement to Bitcoins onboarding procedure