Yeah but he have spread them over 1 wallet id / block..
block 50:
Transaction Fee Size (kB) From (amount) To (amount)
c39f90b085... 0 0.106 Generation: 6000 + 0 total fees 2gpdNLbz9q2QH9GAnLrdeYqQQL9xFTn2Rtj: 6000
block 51:
Transaction Fee Size (kB) From (amount) To (amount)
a7be39451a... 0 0.106 Generation: 6000 + 0 total fees 2gzx6nF5KPF6LjPpv5QbJcSvQedy2xP2eid: 6000
block 52:
Transaction Fee Size (kB) From (amount) To (amount)
b51be4ea12... 0 0.106 Generation: 6000 + 0 total fees 2h8cRhj3HMBvBRmXTsw9pEhjV8DvcgEdMKW: 6000
So impossible to trace, i guess this was done intentionally..
Quite a task to double check 2500 blocks that way.
The only reason you would do like this is to hide something.

Are you a mental midget? The coins were solo mined with bfgminer using default settings. That is the normal output from mining a block. All of the coins end up in 1 address.
Please go start a coin and mine it, so you can educate yourself or Please consult someone who knows something about how coins work before making wild accusations. [/size][/b]
Everybody please try to use the HKC blockchain explorer (link below) to search info of block 50 - 52. Then you will know that MiningViking is telling the truth.
Another possibility is that the outputs of the HKC blockchain explorer are wrong. For the latter case, it is strange that such problem cannot be picked up by the HKC dev. Well.. for people using coingen coin as a cryptocurrency for launching, I could understand that they may not have the capability to pick up such simple mistakes.... LOL