⭐ Merited by ibminer (1)
If your option for privacy involves a third party, thats money laundering, not privacy.
Why that? What's the difference between using a centralized solution and using a decentralized one, self-custody asides? ChipMixer is just a service that does what a protocol should do, that is not currently possible on the base layer, with exchange of your custody. Of course, there's also trust involved, but if I find it eligible to trust, then where's the problem?Wasabi Wallet also requires a coordinator to work. You can't have the same effective CoinJoins otherwise. Does that mean that CoinJoining is also for money laundering, de facto?
Trustless privacy is the only privacy.
Less talk, more pointing to my coins. first off i can assure you using chipmixer is a way to be tagged as a suspect in money laundering.
That's a sign that it works. Whatever authorities can't track is money laundering until proven otherwise. It won't take a lot until usage of Lightning is also flagged red.just look how NY made a new no mining law just the other day.
This is precisely why I want some serious privacy. Laws are crazy, most of the times. If I'm thriving for protection from anti-bitcoin and anti-freedom state laws, then the first thing I'll make sure is to keep my activity disconnected from my identity. Did you lose money on FTX? Thank a Chipmixer advertiser today for supporting the laundering of your funds for the hacker.
Og, the $400m FTX "hack" was just the Bahamas regulator seizing assets.
