If you have taken the time to go back and check whether I have updated the guide to be objective, you should have at least read it carefully enough to notice that I have taken out PPLNS from the sentence about reward methods punishing intermittent miners. Please get your facts right before calling something worthless.
And yes, there are personal biases - I have mentioned before that this guide is based on my personal experience with different pools, with an aim to make it easy to find a comfort zone for the newcomer.
And please let off with the "Same Value in the Long Term" argument. While perfectly valid in statistical terms, it has little relevance to the intermittent miner since it's far more important to know how much reward he/she can expect to earn for a given period of mining.
I did go back and read it and while you tried to fix it with further edge cases it only makes it more complex and STILL wrong.
Score-based pools punish the miner who, for whatever reason, does not or cannot maintain a stable mining operation at the pool for the entire duration of the round.
This is 100% false. Nobody is punished in a score based pool. Even pool hoppers aren't punished it is simply difficult (but not impossible) for them to achieve a >100% PPS return on their shares.
PPLNS pools don't require any special consideration any more than proportional pools do. Essentially unless the pool is corrupted, or hopped the revenue is the same. The only thing that varies is variance.