So.... you want people to pay you money for taking someone elses source code, changing some of the numbers around, slapping a new name on it and releasing it as the next shiny new coin?
Why wouldn't people take that money and invest it in an already established coin with proven developers and communities behind them?
Oh right, then you wouldn't be able to buy yourself a new car or go on that vacation.
Please, take my money now.
And exactly how many of the new coins on the market aside from possibly NXT had entirely new codebase and technology fresh out the gate?
Yep.
While you're welcome to your criticism, your expectations for a coin at inception are quite a bit unrealistic, to say the least.
We all saw what happened to dogecoin, which was anything BUT an innovative coin. While technology is a great driving force for alts, a strong community can easily foreshadow and make up for any possible shortcomings. To argue that notion would be to argue history. A coin is only as good as its adoption.
We are going to aggressively market this coin in every which way possible to ensure it has the greatest chance at success and not just be another here-today-gone-tomorrow coin. We feel that the problem with most alts nowadays, is that they focus so much on the technicals, that they completely ignore the user base and making things fun and accessible. With this coin, we offer basically every possible avenue for people to acquire coins, with the added incentive of high first year proof of stake rewards.
Now contrast this with a 'national coin,' where devs hold 50 percent or more of the premine...and I think you have the real epitome of something criticism worthy.
Thank you for your reply, regardless.