Great. But once they provide the corresponded signature, and we revoke the previous state, they're mine.
but what your digning with them.. is a signature of a commitment which is not for the full amount.. .. ... because whats seen in msat balance at GUI is not whats signed into the state!! do you not understand that part..!
also a revoke is only given to you. when the states change again where they are to not use that old state
yep revokes are for old states not current ones.
so if they broadcast their latest state.. you wont have a revoke for it!
get that yet
...
its like you are both deliberately missing out parts to play things down. rather then you both thinking to actually see things with a risk aware mindset
all your goal for the last couple days is to down play it as user error, and not a flaw which the network should consider finding a solution to prevent.
bitcoin has rules to prevent this crap and yet you lot seem ignorant
no wonder why LN is broke and has flaws and for 5 years has remained like that. which is why LN is not fit for offramping bitcoiners to
due to your attitudes of how little you care about security of your network. ill continue to see LN as a silly subnetwork for small use low value amounts that people should be risk aware, and that they can be prepared to lose. .. where LN should not be seen as a solution to long term use to offramp users away from a secure network