There are Bitcoiners, such as Peter Todd, who are starting to believe that there should be continued block rewards through a "tail emission" for Bitcoin to support the system. I made a topic asking about it before, but no one joined. Hahaha.
Where did you make such topic? I can't find it.
There was a 9-page discussion on this in summer, though:
"Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary" -- A post by Peter ToddI can't find it too, maybe it was just a post in one of someone else's topic, but the "shower thought" behind it was not essentially a tail emission, but a soft fork to decide, yes or no, to a hard fork for maintaining the block rewards by cancelling any future halvings. For example a hard fork, starting on 2048 block rewards are maintained to be at
BTC0.04882812 per block until all the coins are mined, cancelling all future hard forks.