Thanks to the minimal block size increase of the Segwit soft fork.
............... 5 years on..still waiting for the extra tx on chain capacity segwit promised
so what are you thanking segwit for exactly??
If that's your debate, then WHY do we actually need a hard fork to bigger block sizes?
Was it probably all a red herring to hard fork the protocol away from the Core developers? The debate for bigger blocks did start from Gavin Andresen and Mike Hearn, which Mike Hearn FUD that if Bitcoin didn't hard fork to bigger a block size "Bitcoin will die".
Quote
What implementations/proposals did you support with jonald_fyookball?
Plus didn't you try to gaslight people into believing that Bitcoin and BCash "bilaterally split", and therefore according to you, BCash is not an altcoin?
Plus didn't you try to gaslight people into believing that Bitcoin and BCash "bilaterally split", and therefore according to you, BCash is not an altcoin?
ok you wanna poke some social drama rather then discuss the "resource" debate at hand in this topic
-Snipped gaslight about Segwit-
It's not social drama, it's a FACT. You actually said it.